Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Ganges International Private Limited (Madras High Court) High Court held that carry forward of service tax eligible for CENVAT in erstwhile regime cannot be denied for late payment can be denied under GST due to Transitional Period and inability of the petitioner to claim through filing FORM GST […]
Lupin Ltd Vs Union of India (Jammu & Kashmir High Court) Initially, the petitioner was declared to be eligible for exemption/budgetary support till 05.02.2023 but after the subsequent investigation, in view of the order dated 26.07.2021, the petitioner’s unit was found eligible for such benefit only upto 06.11.2017. Therefore, the claim of the petitioner for […]
Ours being a Welfare State, the respondents who happen to be instrumentalities of the State under Article 12, cannot act arbitrarily or unreasonably whilst considering the claim of citizens for the grant of State largesse.
Ernst And Young U.S. LLP Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that when the original proceeding has been completed under Section 143(1), there is no need for fresh tangible material for reopening the assessment and the doctrine of change of opinion does not arise since under Section 143(1) […]
Taking into consideration Notification No. 12/2012-Cus there is no bar for availment of CENVAT Credit in terms of the Rule 3(7) where duty paid under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus and CENVAT Credit cannot be denied.
Sonjoli Construction Co. Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Petitioner submitted that the petitioner was entitled to apply under the SVLDR Scheme and he filed the timely application and deposited the due tax amount under the said Scheme. However, application filed by the petitioner has been rejected only an erroneous ground that audit had […]
PVR Ltd Vs CIT (Delhi High Court) HC held that ITAT erred in law in holding that the difference between the price at which stock options were offered to employees of the appellant company under ESOP and ESPS and the prevailing market price of the stock on the date of grant of such options was […]
Shanu Events Vs State of U.P (Allahabad High Court) Perusal of the e-way bill reveals, the petitioner made an inadvertent error in applying for the e-way bill. After mentioning the place of shipment to ‘Kumbh Mela, Haridwar, Uttarakhand’, the words ‘Madhya Pradesh – 483501’ were filled up. The address having been thus wrongly filled up […]
Priya Vs ITO (Allahabad High Court) Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2/ Income Tax Department. This writ petition has been filed praying, inter alia, for the following relief:- “(i) Issue a writ, or direction in the nature of certiorari […]
HC ruled that in a case where tax has not been remitted, interest U/s. 50 of the GST Acts is leviable even if the tax payer has adequate credit in his cash ledger or credit ledger. In essence, credit cannot be equated with cash remittances.
