Cancellation of GST Registration: Appeal Remedy cannot be Denied Merely Be-cause Option of Revocation was Not Opted, rules Karnataka HC
Section 129, can be invoked by the department with regard to the goods in transit and the goods can be released only in the event the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of penalty as specified in clause (a) or (b) or (c) of Section 129 (1) of the Act and on payment of the said amount, the intent is to give quietus to the litigation.
Graziano Trasmissioni India Private Limited Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The stand on the part of the Department is that the Online Portal mode was chosen by the petitioners, which had resulted in the entire matter having been proceeded Online. The opportunity of hearing was not granted since the same was not requested […]
V.C. Infra Vs Commissioner of State Tax (Bombay High court) Heard. 02] On 18/02/2022 the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax passed an adjudication order directing the petitioner to satisfy the demand of Rs.8,43,502/-. The petitioner being aggrieved by the aforesaid, preferred an appeal before the appellate authority On 02/08/2022, the said appeal came to be […]
When the show cause notice itself clearly says that petitioner should file written statement within seven days of receipt of the notice, we fail to understand as to how 1st respondent could have arrived at such a conclusion.
In any event, in accordance with the mandate of law, the appeal effect order has to be passed within three months of passing of the appeal order.
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs Surindra Engineering Co. Ltd (Bombay High Court) Sub-section (2) to section 35L was inserted with effect from 6th August 2014, i.e., prior to the passing of the order impugned in the present appeal by the CESTAT. Even otherwise, this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V Vs. […]
Nagpur Municipal Corporation to ensure that, no feeding of street dogs takes place at any place except at the own place of the dog feeder or in the dog shelter homes or any other authorised place and we also direct him to impose appropriate penalty for any breach of these directions, which penalty may not be more than of Rs.200/- for every breach as per the resolution already passed in this behalf by Nagpur Municipal Corporation.
Abhay Trading Pvt. Ltd Vs National Aluminium Company Ltd (Orissa High Court) 1. The challenge in the present petition is to continuance of the Arbitrator presently seized of adjudicating the dispute between the parties in view of declaration made by such Arbitrator on 9th September, 2021 that his younger brother was at that point in […]
Siddhi Vinayak Syntex Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) With effect from the year 2011 a time limit has been prescribed for determining the amount of duty of excise where it is possible. It cannot be gainsaid that when the legislature prescribes a time limit, it is incumbent upon the authority to […]
