Delhi High Court directed 10% of the penalty amount imposed by the Competition Commission of India, the recovery of the remaining 90% of the penalty amount would remain stayed.
ABB Global Industries Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High court In case of ABB Global Industries and services Pvt Ltd, Quashed the order passed by the PO on reason of natural justice , as petitioner requested additional time for hearing , PO rejected and passed the order FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF […]
State of Kerala Vs West Bengal Lottery Stockists Syndicate Private Limited (Kerala High Court) Kerala high court In the case of West Bengal Lottery Stockist Syndicate Pvt Ltd, HC held that Such clarification include information to ascertain the legality of the business proposed to be conducted by the applicant, but it does not include furnishing […]
HC held that violation of natural justice is not fatal in all situations and a wholistic view should be taken of the issue, such that the interests of all parties are properly balanced.
High Court Grants IGST refund with interest to petitioner in respect of various export invoices of FY 2019-20 for which details were incorrectly reported in GSTR-1.
Delhi High Court held that combine reading of provisions of reading of sections 67(2) second proviso, 67(3), 74(2), 74(10) clarifies that seized documents or book of things can be retained for a maximum period of four and half years.
Delhi High Court held that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Applicant is not guilty of the offence. Further, the Applicant is also not likely to commit any offence while on bail. Accordingly, bail granted.
Gujarat High Court held that refund is available under Section 54(6) of the CGST read with Section 91(2) of the CGST Rules however due to limitation of GSTN software the same is not granted. Refund allowed along with interest @6%.
Gujarat High Court held that it is satisfied that provisional attachment is hindering the continuation of business of the petitioner, hence continuation of provisional attachment not necessary as the interest of revenue can be safeguarded by furnishing of a bank guarantee.
Patna High Court held that order is bad in law and liable to be quashed as the same was passed in violation of principle of natural justice i.e. without providing fair opportunity of hearing and order was passed e-parte without assigning sufficient reasons.
