Explore the recent Jharkhand High Court verdict on a money laundering case, Gopal Oraon Vs Union of India. Discover the court’s perspective on the lack of material evidence leading to the grant of bail.
Kerala High Court in Dhanya Sreekumari v. State Tax Officer held that cash not being a stock-in-trade of assessee, was not a thing that ought to have been seized and directed Revenue Department to release cash seized to assessee.
In the case of Renuka Sugars Ltd vs State of Gujarat, Gujarat High Court examines validity of lodging a supplementary refund claim under ‘any other’ category for a balance refund amount due to an arithmetical error.
The Calcutta High Court rejects a writ petition challenging a tax assessment order, reaffirming that a Writ Court does not act as an assessing officer or an appellate authority
Analyze the case of PCIT Vs Indravadan Jain, HUF in the Bombay High Court, where the issue of addition u/s 68 for penny stock transactions was examined. Discover how documentary evidence played a crucial role in the court’s decision.
The issue under consideration is that whether the assessee is required to demonstrate commercial expediency during each year concerning a loan which was availed during previous year relevant to A.Y. 2005-06.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that suspension of Customs Broker Licence is against the principles of natural justice as Managing Director being in the judicial custody couldn’t have any opportunity to submit his explanation.
An examination of the Madras High Courts dismissal of the Saravana Groups writ petition challenging tax demand notices for multiple years on technical grounds.
HC held that amount collected without authority of law at the time of search should be refunded along with the interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filling this petition, within 30 days after the receipt of certified copy of order.
Delhi High Court has set aside the assessment order issued against Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited. The main bone of contention was the inadequate response time given to the company to answer a show-cause notice, resulting in a breach of the principles of natural justice.
