Gujarat High Court quashes order rejecting GST refund without reasons in Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs Union of India case. Learn about the court’s decision and its implications.
Delhi High Court’s judgment on the release of seized assets during GST search. Analysis of Section 67 of the Act and its implications. Learn more.
Detailed analysis of Gannon Dunkerley vs. Zillion Infraprojects case verdict by Delhi High Court. Contractor’s payment denial to subcontractor questioned.
Durga Trading Company & Anr. Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) Introduction: In the case of Durga Trading Company & Anr. v. Deputy Director of Income Tax & Ors., the Calcutta High Court examined the validity of an income tax assessment order, focusing on the violation of natural justice. This […]
Read about the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s verdict in the case of M/s Parsvnath Traders v. Principal Commissioner, CGST, which ruled that deposited GST amounts collected during search proceedings should be refunded along with interest.
Allahabad High Court quashes Section 263 order and imposes cost of Rs 10,000 on PCIT for lack of proper opportunity. Analysis of the judgment in M.L. Chains Vs PCIT case.
Rama Shanker Modi Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Appellant Authority cannot reject appeal merely on the ground that order copy was not furnished physically The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Rama Shanker Modi v the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Services tax and Central Excise [WPA 15639 of 2023 dated July 20, 2023] set […]
Karnataka High Court dismissed the writ petition in case of illegal excavation/ transportation of iron ore as discretionary jurisdiction under section 482 of Cr. P.C. cannot be exercised.
Bombay High Court held that Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution which is simplicitor for a money claim is not maintainable. Accordingly, present writ relating to recovery of excess charges paid towards excise supervisory staff is also not maintainable.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that in disproportionate asset case, most of the evidence is documentary and the said documents have already been submitted and therefore there is no question of tampering such an evidence. Hence, bail granted.
