Delhi High Court decides on the admissibility of evidence in PCIT Vs ARN Infrastructure, emphasizing officer authorization & corroborative evidence.
Delhi HC rules that only the Commissioner has the authority under the CGST Act to order the attachment of a bank account. Details on Vikas Enterprises case.
The judgment by the Gujarat High Court in this case reiterates the principle that parallel investigations on the same subject by different GST authorities can lead to legal complexities. By ordering the transfer of documents to a single investigating unit, the court ensures a streamlined process, emphasizing the need for coherence in legal proceedings.
Orissa High Court recently delved into the complexities of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) through the case of Sekh Aminur Islam Vs Commissioner of CT & GST. The pivotal concern was the GST recovery in the absence of a Second Appellate Tribunal
Highlighting Madras High Court’s verdict on Harees Infotech’s plea for the provisional release of imported goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis of Orissa High Court’s directive regarding non-constitution of GSTAT and the tax demand timeframe in Krushna Mohan Dutta Vs Commissioner of CT & GST.
Analysis of B.L. Pahariya Medical Store Vs State of U.P.: Allahabad High Court emphasizes the importance of personal hearing before passing adverse orders.
Delhi High Court held that in terms of section 28(9) of the Customs Act the show cause notice needs to be adjudicated within a period of six months or within one year. Adjudication of notice after expiry of the said period is time-barred.
Delhi High Court rules that GST refund cannot be denied if applications are filed timely and as prescribed, even if there are deficiencies. Read the analysis.
Analysis of Jharkhand HC’s stance on TDS deposits, penalties, and implications on criminal proceedings when deposits are made with interest.
