Bombay High Court held that the reopening of the assessment order based on change of opinion without surfacing of any tangible new information is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside.
In a recent case, the Madras High Court ruled that validly availed credit cannot be denied, even if there were mistakes in TRAN-1 returns filed twice. Get insights into the judgment here
Explore the case of Amba Shakti Udyog Ltd. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. Delve into the importance of timely appeals under Section 107 of the GST Act and the role of delay condonation.
Analysis of Salim Mohammad vs. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue case. Calcutta High Court remands GST penalty case for reconsideration, citing issues with interpretation. Explore the details.
Analysis of Mohler Machine Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT case. Madras High Court sets aside order by NFAC and PCIT, citing lack of clear findings and directs reassessment. Explore the details.
Explore legal implications of changing a company’s name on property ownership and stamp duty, as examined in a case before Himachal Pradesh High Court.
Explore Delhi High Court’s landmark verdict in Union of India vs. Kiran Kanojia. Insights into National Litigation Policy, its impact, and need for government accountability.
Bombay High Court held that Para 3(a) of Circular No. 36/2010 Customs dated 23.09.2010 imposing time limits for amending shipping bills is ultra vires of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Allahabad High Court held that passing of detention order without recording any findings with regard to the submissions made by the assessee is unsustainable in the eye of law and liable to be quashed.
Kerala High Court quashes Income Tax Act Section 148A notice and order, citing absence of a reasonable opportunity for petitioner to be heard
