Madras HC rules on GST for flavoured milk in Parle Agro case. Key verdict on classification; implications for businesses.
Deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was allowable on receipt of interest from co-operative bank as a Co-operative Society was only a co-operative society as defined under the Act, be it a Co-operative Society carrying on banking business or Co-operative Society carrying on the other businesses or a Co-operative bank.
The proceedings drawn, admittedly being beyond a period that was prescribed under sub-section (2A) of Section 153 and the consequential orders passed were all beyond the period of limitation prescribed under sub-section (2A) of Section 153 hence, the same being not sustainable, deserved to be and was accordingly set aside/quashed.
Delhi High Court held that disallowance of travel expenditure unjustified as the expenses incurred had a nexus with the business interest of the respondent/assessee and AO has not brought anything on record to prove that the expenditure were of personal nature.
Delhi High Court held that notice for reopening of assessment issued u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act on the last date of the limitation period cannot be said be have been issued beyond the period of limitation.
Delhi High Court quashes 148 notices for AY 2016-17 & 2017-18, setting precedent against retrospective tax assessments under Rs 50L; protects taxpayers’ rights.
Read the Calcutta High Court judgment in Pawan Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India, exposing procedural irregularities in the Income Tax Act Section 148A(b) order dated April 6, 2023.
Kerala High Court held that the provisions i.e. Sections 14A & 74H of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 not relating to any aspect of banking are within the legislative competence of the State Legislature.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that diesel even though being provided free of cost by the service recipient to GTA service provider has to be added to the value for the purpose of GST.
Delhi High Court held that the taxing authorities would be bound by the view already taken and it would in any case be impermissible for them to take contrarian views with respect to an identical set of facts. Accordingly, refund granted in earlier occasions has to be granted currently as based on identical set of facts.
