Explore Gunjan Bindal case where Delhi High Court rules against Revenue Department’s cash seizure under Section 67 of CGST Act. Detailed analysis, implications, and judgment insights.
This HC directs CIT (A) to consider Appellant’s grounds & pass Order on merits: read our blog post to learn more about this Madras High Court judgment!
Delhi High Court in matter involving Law Minister of the State of West Bengal in illegal coal excavation case directed Directorate of Enforcement (ED) to summons the petitioner at its Kolkata Office by giving at least 24 hours notice considering the age and medical status of the minister.
Bombay High Court held that it was appropriate for the petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for refund of money as amount deposited under protest was retained by the department without authority of law.
In a recent case, Lupin Limited challenged a recovery order related to excess cash refund under the Budgetary Support Scheme. Sikkim High Court directs reconsideration, highlighting crucial aspects.
SRSS Agro Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India: Gujarat High Court to examine validity of Notification No. 09/2023-Central Tax extending period for proceedings initiated by Revenue Department
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the provisions of Section 26E of the Securitisation and Reconstructions of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 shall override the rights of others to recover the outstanding liability of taxes dues etc on the mortgaged/charged property from the original owner etc.
Kerala High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that furnishing of shipping document or best evidence is must in respect of supplies made to the Union Territory of Lakshadweep for the purpose of availing concessional rate of tax @4% under proviso to section 6(1) of the KVAT Act.
Madras High Court held that Advance Ruling holding that services of loading, unloading, packing etc., rendered in relation to the wheat imported is not entitled to exemption in terms of S.No.54(e) of Notification No.12 of 2017 is unsustainable.
Patna High Court held that adjustment of entry tax paid on damaged cement is not admissible under the provisions of Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or Sale therein Act, 1993.
