In re Enmarol Petroleum India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Whether the applicant is liable to pay GST on the supply of goods located outside India to customers within India without physically bringing the goods to India? Answer :- Answered in the negative. Question 2:- Whether the out & out supplies in the […]
Whether CIDCO is covered under the definition of the term ‘Government Entity’ as per Notification No. 31/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 13 October 2017?
In re Bhutoria Refrigeration Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Whether the Fan Coil Unit is covered under HSN Code 8418 under Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Fan Coil Unit (FCU) is a simple device consisting of a heating and or cooling heat exchanger or ‘Coil’ and fan. It is a part of […]
In re Sonkamal Enterprises Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether the procedure to raise the invoice from Mumbai Head Office for imports received at Haldia Port Kolkata where we do not have any separate GST Registration and Charge IGST from Mumbai to our Customers is correct or do we have to take separate Registration in […]
In re Yogiraj Powertech Private Limited (GST AAR Maharastra) Question 1. :- Whether EPC Contract for electrical cable supply and laying work can be classified as contract for building, construction, fabrication, completion, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair, maintenance, renovation, alteration or commissioning of immovable property wherein transfer of property in goods (whether as goods […]
Whether MEP activities (Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Works) undertaken by the applicant falls within the definition of composite supply of works contract as defined under Section 2(119) of CGST Act??
In re Kolte Patil Developers Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) Applicant asked ‘What is the legal procedure for cancellation of flat which is booked in pre-GST Regime and cancelled in post-GST Regime. Also, GST liability in cases where some small amount is retained, for cancellation (after discussion with customer).’ AAR held that questions posed before us […]
Whether following two categories of products will be classifiable under Entry 24 of Schedule IV of Notification No. 1/2017Central Taxes (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 liable to CGST at 14% or Entry 97 of Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017 – Central Taxes (Rate) liable to CGST at 9%?
The supply of renting of workwear along with other services such as transportation, weekly washing etc. for a single consideration is a mixed supply under section 2 (74) of CGST Act.
In re Behr-Hella Thermocontrol India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) The argument of the applicant is that the services provided by the applicant in this case, as per the agreement, are completed only when the test reports are sent to their overseas clients is not tenable for the reason that first of all the service of […]