Sponsored
    Follow Us:

No protective addition when substantive addition already been made

June 4, 2024 438 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Ahmedabad rules against reopening of assessment for protective addition when based on assumptions, deleting the addition. Read the detailed analysis here.

Extension of Last Date Due to Holiday to Immediate Next Working Day: CESTAT Upheld Reduced Penalty Benefit

June 4, 2024 234 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi rules in favor of Honda Cars India, affirming reduced 15% penalty under Customs Act Section 28(5) if paid within 30 days of SCN receipt.

Assessment order quashed as section 153D approval was without application of mind

June 4, 2024 528 Views 0 comment Print

Read the detailed analysis of Delhi ITATs decision in MDLR Airline Vs DCIT case, highlighting the lack of proper approval under Section 153D of the Income-tax Act.

Typographical Error in Bills of Entry: Custom duty leviable on actual goods imported

June 4, 2024 216 Views 0 comment Print

Duties of Customs are to be charged on the goods imported into India (section 12) and not on the goods said to have been imported into India.

AO cannot change his view in the garb of rectification of mistake under section 154

June 4, 2024 552 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Delhi rules that the accepted investment source by AO cannot be rectified under Section 154, quashing the income tax assessment order.

LTCG from Penny Stock: ITAT upholds addition as Income from other Source

June 4, 2024 498 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Chennai upholds addition on LTCG arising from purchase and sale of shares due to failure to produce documents. Read the full analysis of the case.

ITAT Deletes Section 69C Addition for Capital Introduced by Partner

June 4, 2024 489 Views 0 comment Print

Detailed analysis of ITAT’s decision to delete the Section 69C addition for capital introduced by a partner in the Shivam Developers vs DCIT case at Ahmedabad.

Erroneous Classification Not Misdeclaration: CESTAT Deletes Section 114AA Penalty

June 4, 2024 267 Views 0 comment Print

Analysis of Raj Metals & Alloys Vs. Commissioner of Customs case by CESTAT Delhi. Detailed examination of erroneous classification and penalties under Customs Act.

Small Quantity Differences not Justify Mis-Declaration Allegations: CESTAT

June 4, 2024 162 Views 0 comment Print

Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Chennai order regarding mis-declaration of goods, penalty under Customs Act 1962, and setting aside of penalties and fines.

Section 41(1) addition for difference in sundry creditors without reasoning: ITAT remands issue back to AO

June 4, 2024 264 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Hyderabad remands Jonna Iron Mart Vs ACIT case regarding Section 41(1) addition due to lack of discussion on Sundry Creditors difference by Income Tax Authorities.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031