ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of V. K. Nanavaty Share and Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd, quashing the reopening of assessment as wholly without jurisdiction under section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
Amirul Islam Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) The case of Amirul Islam Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. in the Calcutta High Court revolves around the cancellation of GST registration under the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (WBGST Act). The petitioner, Amirul Islam, challenged the cancellation […]
Allahabad HC imposes heavy costs & disciplinary action on GST officers for not providing personal hearings. NS Agro and Engineering Products Vs State of U.P.
In a case before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the absence of the authority’s signature on the order leads to its nullification. Detailed analysis here.
Explore detailed analysis of case between G.R.R. Associates and Andhra Pradesh VAT Appellate Tribunal regarding service of notice in compliance with Rule 64 of A.P.VAT Rules, 2005.
Varsha Foods Products India Pvt Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner (ST): Andhra Pradesh High Court rules GST on Mango Pulp at 12%, citing a government circular.
Detailed analysis of the Rajasthan High Court judgment on whether crane services provided constitute a sale under Section 2(35)(iv) of the RVAT Act-2003. Key arguments, contract analysis, and legal implications discussed.
Allahabad High Court rules that a godown search and seizure cannot lead to penalty under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act. Read detailed judgment.
Reassessment proceedings initiated by officers without jurisdiction and completed by different officers without recording fresh reasons are legally untenable.
ITAT observed that reasons recorded by AO for reopening assessment did not mention name of assessee’s broker or specific details implicating assessee in fraudulent CCM transactions. Information provided did not establish a direct link between assessee and alleged tax evasion practices.
