Notification No. 82/2017–Customs In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do
Notification No. 81/2017–Customs- seeks to amend notification No. 14/2006-customs dated 1st march 2006, to prescribe effective rate of duty on specified fabrics
Notification No. 99/2017-Customs (N.T.) amending Notification No.82/2017-Customs (N.T.) dated 24th August, 2017, Notification No.85/2017-Customs (N.T.) dated 24th August, 2017, Notification No.92/2017-Customs (N.T.) dated 28th September, 2017
The records that are part of counterparty supplier’s submitted GSTR -I are known as Submitted records. The records that are part of counterparty supplier’s GSTR -1 which is yet to be submitted/filed are known as Saved records.
In absence of law prohibiting transfer, no restriction to transfer the land can be directed by respondent No.2 as right to property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India is not only constitutional or legal right, but it is also human right and a person can be deprived of that right only by authority of law.
All companies required to prepare or voluntarily preparing their financial statements in accordance with Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 for financial year 2016-2017 are required to file their statements only in XBRL format.
In the case of more than one properties are purchased by the assessee, the option is available with the assessee to claim benefit under Section 54 in respect of the residential house purchased for the assessee’s own residence.
Pushpa Rajawat Vs CIT (Rajasthan High Court) Since, the original proceedings were pending before the Commissioner (Appeals), without entering into the question of jurisdiction of the Sawaimadhopur assessing officer, the fact remains that the adjudicating authority could not have issued second show cause notice under section 148. In that view of the matter, without entering […]
In this case the appellant is receiving the material on Freight Prepaid basis (C&F). The foreign shipping companies were charging only the incidental charges like Port charges, Container payment, Stationery charges, License fees, Stamp charges, Bank charges, De-stuffing charges etc.
Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Hedging forward contracts of foreign currency cannot be marked to market (MTM) on balance sheet date as already there is a underlying asset and there is no extra outgo for settlement of the forward contract other than already determined in the contract and thus there is no […]
