Notification No. 90/2017-Customs CBEC hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 56/2000-Customs, dated the 5th May, 2000, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (i) vide number G.S.R. 399 (E), dated the 5th May, 2000, namely:-
Prohibition on export of Red Sanders wood in log form has been relaxed for export of 186.588 MTs of Red Sanders wood, in log form, through State Government of Karnataka.
Supreme Court questioned the maintainability of the petition filed by CPI Leader in which he challenged the provisions of section 139AA of the Income Tax Act,1961 which mandates linking of Aadhaar with PAN number for filing income tax returns (ITR). The petition was later withdrawn by the counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Supreme Court […]
Question No. 1: I am restaurant owner and also have supply of some other services worth Rs. 1 lakh. Am I eligible for Composition scheme ? Answer: No. Please refer to Section 10 of CGST Act. Question No. 2: Challan for Job work in farm ITC-04 needs to be filed by 25th of next quarter. […]
It is not open to the Appellate Commissioner to introduce in the Assessment a new source of income and the assessment must be confined to those items of income which were the subject-matter of the original assessment.
U.P. Distillers Association Vs. CIT (Delhi High Court) In this case Assessee urged that, in any event, the cancellation could not have been from inception but only from the date Parliament amended Section 12AA, i.e. from 01.10.2004. HC held that that the cancellation of registration in this case could have related back only from the […]
Unless return of income already filed is disposed of, notice under section 148, cannot be issued, i.e., no reassessment proceedings can be initiated so long as assessment proceedings pending on the basis of the return already filed are not terminated.
Where in case of reassessment proceedings stay was granted by court and thereafter stay was vacated, the reassessment order was to be passed within 60 days from the date of vacation of stay, AO was not justified in saying that the period of 60 days should be counted from the date of receipt of order in office since it was not aware of the order.
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah ACIT vs. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. (Delhi ITAT) Mercantile based accounting requires income and expenditure of a financial year has to be taken in account in the same, concerned financial year. In ACIT vs. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. & vice versa [ITA Nos. 5246, 5247, 5248, 5249 and 5286/Del/2012, […]
Is ITC available on vehicle taken on lease for employee in a manufacturing company? No. It is not allowed as per section 17(5) of CGST Act, 2017.
