Specific provisions on Anti- profiteering have been legislated in Goods and Service Tax GST law. The anti- profiteering provisions are inherently designed to protect consumer by restricting the companies to benefit unjustly on account of any reduction in GST rates or enhancement in tax credit pool.
EPFO has taken advance action by closing the server and host service through Common Service Centres pending vulnerability checks as part of the data security and protection. EPFO has been taking all necessary precautions and measures to ensure that no data leakage takes place.
The Multi-disciplinary case study would involve application of two or more of the seven core subjects at the Final level. The reference material which would be provided to the students as open book in respect of each of these subjects for the purpose of solving Final Paper 6F: Multi-disciplinary Case Study are indicated hereunder:
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has been issuing various circulars/ guidelines from time to time. In order to enable the industry and other users to have access to all the applicable circulars/ directions at one place, Master Circular for Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) has been prepared.
Himachal Pradesh hereby notifies that no E-Way Bill shall be required for intra-state movement of goods within the state of Himachal Pradesh except for intra-state movement of following 17 goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees:
While the FPIs are only permitted to invest in corporate bonds with minimum residual maturity of above one year, in order to bring consistency across debt categories, it is stipulated that investments by an FPI in corporate bonds with residual maturity below one year shall not exceed, at any point in time, 20% of the total investment of that FPI in corporate bonds.
Central Government hereby appoints the 1st day of May, 2018 as the date on which the provisions of Section 227 to Section 229 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 shall come into force.
To sum up, even under the amended law, in all cases, there must exist reason to believe that income has escaped assessment and a mere change of opinion on the same facts and law does not justify a reassessment. For a reassessment proceeding initiated after four years, it must further be established that the escapement was by reason of failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts.
It is apparent that when the assessee could not establish the genuineness of the impugned transaction before the Assessing Officer that it decided to surrender an amount of Rs. 55 lakh. Thus, the factual matrix indicates that the assessee made the surrender when it had no explanation to offer. Thus, the assessee could not prove the bona fide of its claim.
This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2009-10. In this appeal, the assessee is aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT (A)-V, Hyderabad, dated 31/08/2016 confirming the assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the I.T. Act dated 4.3.2015.
