Office Order No. 240 of 2020 Consequent upon diversion of posts to the newly created National Faceless Appellate Centre (NFAC), Delhi and its four Regional Faceless Appellate Centres (RAFC), the transfer/postings of the following officers in the grade of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, are hereby ordered with immediate effect and until further orders:
It had come to the notice of the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting that a large number of advertisements on Online Gaming, Fantasy Sports, etc have been appearing on television.
Inderjit Singh Sodhi And Others Vs The Chairman Punjab State Electricity Board And Another (Supreme Court of India) We find that the appellants were promoted within 9 or 16 years from their initial appointment, therefore, they are not entitled to time bound promotional scale. Kirpal Singh Mangat and Raj Kumar Garg were appointed by direct […]
The larger bench of the Hon’ble Supreme court orders all Investigation Agencies, including DRI/ NCB/ED/NIA/CIA, having the power to interrogate and arrest, to install CCTV camera and recording equipment and record the same when interrogation takes place.
In re R. S. Development & Constructions Pvt Ltd. (GST AAAR Kerala) The Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd falls under the category of a Government entity for the purpose of the said exemption. The supply of services viz. execution of the civil works of Pazhassi small hydro electric project covered under Work order No. 06/CEECCN/ […]
1. This has reference to Notification of IRDAI (Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 whereby a. Vide Regulation 21(3) insurer are required to file with the Authority report on misconduct of licensed surveyors annually b. Vide Regulation 21(4) Insurers are required to maintain half yearly data in the prescribed format.
Assetz Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the interest free advances received from customers was available with the assessee to the tune of Rs.16.96 crores as noticed by Ld CIT(A) at page 28 of his order, i.e., Rs.14.22 crores under Schedule V and Rs.2.74 […]
Agilent Technologies India Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) With respect to the Infosys technologies it is the claim of the assessee that the turnover of the above company is such a huge turnover that it is not comparable with the assessee company is software development division. For this proposition we look at page number […]
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement Vs A. Raja & Ors (Delhi High Court) 1. The application Crl.M.A. 10885/2020 is filed by respondent No.17- M/s Conwood Construction & Developers (P) Ltd. and Crl.M.A. 12520/2020 is filed by respondent No.15- M/s Dynamix Realty. The applicants are seeking modification of the ex parte ad interim order dated […]
Dr. Malabika Bhattacharjee Vs Internal Complaints Committe, Vivekananda College & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) A cursory glance at Section 2(m) of the posh 2013 Act shows that the term ‘respondent’ brings within its fold ‘a person’, thereby including persons of all genders. Although there is substance in the submission of the petitioner that the said […]
