Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on Steel & Metals Co. penalty for CENVAT invoicing violations. Understand the case, analysis, and the implications of Rule 26.
Explore the dispute in Sh. Avtar Singh case where the Assessing Officer decision to reopen the assessment is challenged. Detailed analysis of cash deposits and legal aspects.
In the case of Shri M.Y. Jahabar Sadique vs. ITO, ITAT Chennai confirms AO decision on unexplained cash gifts and discrepancies in business advances. Detailed analysis here.
It is a clear case of an omission and, thus, non-application mind by the AO in the matter. That an absence or lack of enquiry, which ought to have been made under the circumstances, renders the order as erroneous in-so-far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue, liable for revision u/s. 263,
The new auditor, as per the established procedure, sought a no objection from the earlier auditor, who raised certain objections. Those issues were resolved later on, which led to the delay in the audit of the accounts of the assessee.
Explore the ITAT Visakhapatnam’s resolution in the case of Smt. Sabhapathi Padmasree vs. ITO regarding deemed dividends. Learn how collateral security provided by the assessee impacted the tax treatment of loans and advances under section 2(22)(e).
Explore the ITAT Chennai resolution in the case of Shri Krishnapandian Balaji vs. DCIT regarding unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. Learn how the assessee justified the source as rental income.
ITAT Chennai ruled in favor of Om Balaji Stores, finding no justification for disallowance u/s 40A(3). Detailed analysis of the case and the importance of documentary evidence.
In exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)(hereafter referred to as the said Act), read with proviso to sub-rule (7) of rule 10CA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arms length price determined under section 92C of the said Act and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed one per cent.
Explore the case of Rakesh Roshan vs. State of Bihar in the Patna High Court, delving into the quashing of tax demands, violation of natural justice, and the importance of fair hearings.
