Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Income Tax Appeal not maintainable after declaration of moratorium under IBC

July 10, 2022 2046 Views 0 comment Print

Twinkle Enviro Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) At the outset, we find that assessee’s case has been referred to Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for Insolvency Resolution Process and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has been appointed in the assessee company. In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble NCLT, we […]

HC restrains Rogue Websites from Illegally live streaming various sporting events

July 10, 2022 315 Views 0 comment Print

Culver Max Entertainment Private Limited Vs F1.mylivecricket.live and Ors (Delhi High Court) Defendants No. 1 to 39 are said to be rogue infringing websites engaged in the business of uploading pirated and unlicensed content. Among the various illegal acts done by them is the live streaming of various sporting events. Unauthorized communication/ broadcast to public […]

ITAT restricts disallowance of Car expenses to 15% for personal use

July 10, 2022 2718 Views 0 comment Print

Jaykumar Mangilal Nagori Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) It is indisputable that the assessee could not lead any evidence to demonstrate that the user of the car was restricted only to business purposes and did not percolate for personal use. Even the auditor has also mentioned that the personal element in vehicle expenses could not be […]

Customs Broker cannot be penalised in violation of basic principles of natural justice

July 10, 2022 525 Views 0 comment Print

JKG associates Pvt. Ltd vs union of India & Ors (Calcutta High Court) Petitioner challenges the impugned action imposing the aforesaid penalty on the ground that the same is not sustainable for the reason of non-compliance of the formalities under Regulation 17 by which respondent Commissioner of Customs was required to issue a notice in […]

TDS provisions not applicable to late fee and service tax

July 10, 2022 339 Views 0 comment Print

Since, the said amount pertains to late fee and service tax, therefore the provisions of TDS does not apply to the late fee and service tax, hence we delete the addition of Rs.10,48,125/-, made by the Assessing Officer.

No addition for cash deposit after demonetisation against cash withdrawn before demonetisation

July 10, 2022 1434 Views 0 comment Print

Coastal Fertilisers Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) We note that the cash sum of Rs. 94,50,000/- was deposited in the bank account held with Union Bank of India, account no. 495601010033544 on 16.11.2016. This date of deposit falls in post-demonetization period. On 08.11.2016 demonetization scheme was announced scrapping of currencies in the Rs. 1,000/­& Rs. […]

Non-business expense cannot be claimed as Business expense to set-off against house property Income

July 10, 2022 2640 Views 0 comment Print

C. Krishniah Chetty & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The grounds raised by the assessee, are only seeking set off of current year loss against income from house property and carry forward of loss to the future years amounting to Rs.76,26,766/-. The Ld.AR vehemently submitted that, the assessee incurred expenses in terms of […]

Article 226 cannot be invoked if petitioners have statutory remedy before NCLAT

July 10, 2022 315 Views 0 comment Print

Since the petitioners are having effective and statutory remedy before the Appellate Authority, they cannot come to this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

ITAT deletes Section 271G penalty for non-submission of comparable prices of diamonds

July 10, 2022 363 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Interjwel private limited (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee submitted that in a diamond business world over there are estimated 8000 – 10,000 different qualities of diamonds price of which depends on various factors and note to diamonds can have the same price as valuation also depends upon the perception of individual businessman. Assessee therefore […]

CESTAT allows 12% interest from date of encashment of Bank Guarantee till the date of refund

July 8, 2022 873 Views 0 comment Print

Leather Sellers Vs Commissioner of Customs And Excise, Patparganj (CESTAT Delhi) The brief facts are that the appellant is a manufacturer-exporter of leather goods. They had re-imported a consignment of goods, which were earlier exported for the purpose of repair etc. and thereafter, re­export. For such re-import, the appellant had filed Bill of Entry dated […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031