Assessee filed return of income within extended due date with Form No. 67 & complies with requirement of Rule 128(9) and entitled to claim FTC
Harish Tex Mach Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In terms of Notification No. 6/2005-ST, the exemption was provided upto the aggregate value of Rs. 4 lakh in the year 2005-06, 2006-07 and Rs. 8 Lakh in the year 2007-08 and 2008-09. Accordingly, the value of taxable services of the […]
Isolux Corsan Power Concession India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In this case AO has treated Interest income as Income from other sources as Business of Assessee was not set-up in the year under consideration and held as follows:- In the present case, the appellant has miserably failed to demonstrate that during the year […]
Section 73 and 74 of CGST Act also provide for recovery of refund where the same has been erroneously granted.
GST registration cannot be cancelled for allegedly being a bogus firm as it is not a ground enumerated under Section 29(2) of GST Act
CESTAT held that penalty under Rule 15(1) on the present appellant, who is merely an employee of the Company, is not sustainable.
Deepak Shriniwas Mantri Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 26-09-2022 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi in relation to the assessment year 2008-09. 2. I have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen that […]
Acclaris Business Solutions Private Ltd Vs Commr. of CGST & CX, Kolkata North (CESTAT Kolkata) When the Appeal came up for hearing, the Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that they had filed a refund claim for Rs.9,79,412/- in terms of Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Adjudicating Authority […]
RK Gupta And Son HUF Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) HC held that notice dated 19.05.2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 shows, that a survey report was generated vis-à-vis Varun Capital Services Ltd. The said communication also alludes to the fact that assessee had entered into share transaction with Kisna […]
Namoshivai Apparels Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court) One of the questions that arises for consideration of this Court is whether the respondent can continue blocking the Input Tax Credit beyond the period of one year by unblocking if after the expiry of one year and immediately blocking it thereafter. […]
