Dive into the Delhi High Court’s decision in the case of Ohmi Industries Asia vs Assistant Commissioner, which paves the way for GST refunds on Market Research Services.
A detailed analysis of the ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling in Bhutakia Bhimasar Vs PCIT, where it was held that a charitable organization should not lose tax exemption benefits due to technical lapses.
Understand the Bombay High Court’s ruling on PCIT vs Kimberly Clark Lever Private Limited case regarding the reference to TPO and the scrutiny assessment as per the Income Tax Act 1961.
Delhi High Court quashes a ₹10 crore tax demand, stating that an assessment order cannot be solely issued against one of the multiple legal heirs of a deceased taxpayer.
In a crucial verdict, the Bombay High Court allows BOCW cess refund to GE T and D India, emphasizing that supply contracts are outside the BOCW Cess Act’s purview.
The ITAT Indore supports the principle of natural justice by asking for re-adjudication of the case of R.M. Chemicals Private Limited vs DCIT due to insufficient opportunity provided to the assessee in the initial assessment.
In the case between Shital Ispat Pvt Ltd and C.C.-Jamnagar, CESTAT Ahmedabad orders re-consideration, stating the one-year period for filing a refund begins from the date of finalizing the bill of entry in instances of initial provisional assessment.
Explore the crucial CESTAT Ahmedabad judgment on Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T, casting a spotlight on the adherence to EXIM policy and implications for the pharmaceutical industry.
ITAT Delhi, in a significant ruling, held that no addition can be made on unaccounted share capital if it has already been taxed under the category of ‘Source of Income’. Dive into the intricate details of the case: DCIT Vs Subhshree Investment Management Pvt Ltd.
MCA penalizes MIS Sandal Nidhi Limited for incorrect company name in auditor appointment letter attached in ADT-1. Detailed analysis of violation and penalty imposition.
