A detailed look at the case of IGP Engineers Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, where CESTAT ruled that duty exemption could not be denied due to an initial mismatch.
Explore the detailed analysis of the judgment passed by ITAT Delhi in the case of Boston Scientific International Vs ACIT, where the tribunal quashed reassessment proceedings due to lack of tangible material.
Dive into the Calcutta High Court’s verdict on the case of Newby Teas Overseas Private Limited Vs Joint Commissioner (Appeal), leading to a remand for readjudication of a customs refund claim.
Learn about the Smart Meters Quality Control Order 2023 issued by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. Understand the compulsory use of standard marks and the certification authority. Ensure compliance with the Indian Standards for smart meters.
An in-depth analysis of the case Parag Bhikhubhai Patel vs ITO, exploring implications of using passports to confirm US tax residency for NRIs under India-USA Tax Treaty
A detailed overview of ITAT Guwahati’s ruling in the case of S.B. Traders Vs ACIT, where the Tribunal called for re-adjudication due to insufficient opportunity provided to the assessee.
The CESTAT Kolkata has ruled in favor of Haldia Petrochemicals Limited in Excise Appeal No. 762/2010. The appeal challenged the duty demand of Rs. 10,67,40,103/- under the proviso to Section 11A, along with interest and penalty.
Read about the Resin Treated Compressed Wood Laminates (Quality Control) Order, 2023 issued by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. The order mandates the compulsory use of standard marks for specific goods and articles and designates the Bureau of Indian Standards as the certifying and enforcing authority.
CESTAT Kolkata has quashed the service tax demand imposed on Walchandnagar Industries Limited (WIL) in a case involving a composite contract for setting up a cement manufacturing unit. The tribunal determined that the contract primarily involved the supply of goods, and the value assigned to the bought-out items sold by WIL cannot be considered as a consulting engineer service.
Calcutta High Court quashed imposition of a 200% penalty on Bitumix India LLP for a violation related to an expired e-Way Bill. HC determined that while there was a violation, it was not grave enough to warrant such a high penalty. Instead, court directed appellants to pay a penalty of Rs. 50,000, which includes both CGST and WBGST.
