Review of ITAT Mumbai’s ruling in Kamlesh Vasant Nerkar Vs CIT, emphasizing the need for AO to recognize income that has been adequately explained by the taxpayer.
In Sandip Chattopadhyay vs. ITO case, ITAT Kolkata ruled that deductions under sections 24(b), 80C, and 80D cannot be denied for not being claimed in ITR.
An analysis of ITAT Delhi’s ruling in the Neeti Rastogi vs. ACIT case, emphasizing CBDT Circular’s role in defining unexplained jewellery under the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chandigarh rules on treating surrendered income as medical profession income in the case Bharat Vipan Garg Vs PCIT. Dive deep into the judgment details.
Tripura High Court’s decision on whether the Limitation Act 1963 applies to GST appeals. Analysis of Sanjib Kumar Pal Vs Union of India.
CESTAT Chennai supports Fourrts India Laboratories, ruling that physician samples fall under Section 4 (1) (a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Dive into the details of this landmark decision.
Detailed analysis of Beach Minerals Company’s appeal against Commissioner of GST & Central Excise ruling. CESTAT Chennai orders fresh adjudication.
The ITAT Delhi ruling on Seaview Developers regarding deduction claims under section 80IAB for sales of food and beverages and interest expenses.
Analysis of ITAT Delhi’s verdict on Global Research Forum’s service income labeled as a donation. The impact of misclassifying income in financial records.
Explore the CESTAT Kolkata ruling on whether flue gas generated during metallurgical coke manufacturing is a manufactured product and subject to excise duty. Learn about the legal analysis and implications.
