Association of aggrieved Workmen Association of aggrieved Workmen of of Jet Airways (India) Limited Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) Facts- The only question involved is whether the appellant is entitled for a copy of resolution plan or any part of it. Notably, the resolution plan is already approved by the Adjudicating Authority. Conclusion- Resolution plan […]
Bank of Baroda & Anr. Vs MBL Infrastructures Limited & Ors. (Supreme Court of India) Facts- Corporate insolvency resolution process was initiated against respondent No. 1. Two resolution plans were received by the resolution professional (respondent no. 2). Committee of creditors decided seeking an appropriate resolution plan at the hands of respondent no. 3. Section […]
The person claiming the exemption has to fulfil and satisfy all the eligibility criteria/conditions mentioned in the exemption notification. The respondent (ESL) was not eligible at all for exemption from payment of purchase tax as in fact power generating companies (EPL) were put in the list of ‘ineligible industries’. Therefore, by such a modus operandi, the benefit, which was not available to the EPL was made available by such transfer of raw materials by the ESL to EPL.
The Arbitrator is the final arbiter of the disputes between the parties and it is not open to a party to challenge the Award on the ground that he has drawn his own conclusions or has failed to appreciate certain facts.
Employees’ State Insurance Corporation Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) Facts- The ESIC has filed the present appeal against the judgement of Division Bench which rejected the petition filed against the promotion of the contesting respondent to the post of ‘Associate Professor’ under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme (DACP Scheme). Fact of […]
Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. Vs Antrix Corporation Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Facts- The company, Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd., in liquidation has challenged an order of winding up passed by the National Company Law Tribunal under section 271(c) of Companies Act, 2013. The order was confirmed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. It is contended […]
Van Buren Vs United States (Supreme Court of United States) Facts- The main issue involved is unauthorized access of computer under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 86 by a police sergeant. As alleged, the police sergeant used his patrol-car computer to access a law enforcement database to retrieve information about a particular license plate […]
This Court is of the considered opinion that changing mode of instruction to English or imparting education in English per-se is not violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the children or to their parents under Article 21A of the Constitution of India. Because Article 21A only assures right of a child below 14 years to have access to free and compulsory education, whereas the manner has been left at the discretion of the State to be determined by law.
MRF Limited Vs Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) (Madras High Court) Facts- The main allegation is that when natural rubber price increased, the tyre prices were increased in a concerted manner by the domestic major tyre manufacturers, however, when the price of natural rubber decreased, the tyre prices were not reduced by the domestic major […]
Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) and Anr. Vs Ramesh Chandra Meena & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) Facts- While working as Branch Manager, it was alleged that he committed irregularities while granting loans to farmers/ villagers under loan scheme. He didn’t take adequate precautions and without writing mandates of borrowers, he transferred the loan amount in […]
