VCI Hospitality Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Interest expenses on FBT being penal in nature cannot be treated as business expenses Facts- Assessee is a company engaged in the business of hotel operations and marketing activities. Assessee filed its ROI for A.Y. 2011-12 on 30.09.2011 declaring income of Rs.80,67,320/-. The case was selected for scrutiny […]
La Opala Rg. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) The assessee was under compulsion to maintain a deposit with the electricity board to ensure supply of power to the unit and such interest income had first-degree nexus with the eligible undertaking of the assessee and accordingly the same would equally qualify for the deduction u/s 80IC […]
Held that employee is eligible for relief u/s 89 on one-time lumpsum ex-gratia amounts payable by the employer as such compensation received is treated as salary received in advance.
Stock of Exotic Live Spices was declared as per Voluntary Disclosure Scheme titled as ‘Advisory for Dealing with Import of Exotic Live Species in India and declaration of stock’ accordingly held that summon issued to the appellant by the respondent no. 3 is bad in law and illegal.
S K Srivastava Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes (Delhi High Court) The Income Tax Act, 1961 provides complete machinery for the assessment/ reassessment of tax, imposition of penalty and for obtaining relief with respect to an improper order. One ought to not abandon this machinery and invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court u/A […]
The Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax Vs Amrit Cement Limited (Meghalaya High Court) The eligibility or entitlement to obtain cenvat credit, in terms of Section 140(1) of the Act of 2017, is based on whether the matter is reflected in the return which is filed as per the existing law in the manner prescribed; […]
Sling Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Payments forming part of CSR were claimed as deduction under section 80G. Held that assessee cannot be denied the benefit of claim under Chapter VI A, which is considered for computing ‘Total Taxable Income”. If assessee is denied this benefit, merely because such payment forms part of […]
Meghmani Energy Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Set-off of unabsorbed brought forward depreciation and business loss allowed, even though there was no manufacturing activity during the year, as the business was not abandoned/ closed Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business of producing energy. During the course of the assessment proceedings, AO observed that […]
A. Sivashankar Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) In our considered view, the estimation made by the AO towards undisclosed income of under reporting of sales Revenue from sale of plots, is purely a guess work, which is based on the suspicion and surmises, but not based on any material evidences. Facts- The only issue that came […]
Mangal Das son of late Shri Asandas Vs Amar Singh Son of Shri Moolchand Chauhan (Rajasthan High Court) The basic object of the Rent Control Act, 1950 is to save the harassment of tenant from unscrupulous landlords. However, such object of the Rent Control Act, 1950 may not be misconstrued to deprive the landlords of […]
