Held that information available on the social media platform of petitioner shows that the event were conducted. Petition dismissed giving liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority.
Held that the machines which are cleared after utilization cannot be treated as machines cleared as such. Accordingly, duty equal to cenvat credit not payable as prescribed under rule 3(5) of CCR, 2004
Held that it is settled that the government dues against the assessee cannot be recovered from the owner of the property which was leased out to the assessee against whom the dues are pending
Held that no part consideration of acquisition of asset/property was paid on alleged execution of possession-cum-Satakat and there is no other corroborative evidence to substantiate the claim of assessee. Capital gain treated as STCG instead of LTCG.
Held that the allegation of clandestine production and removal has to be established against any person by independent and tangible evidence. No demand exists in absence of such evidence.
Bombay High Court held that importers who fall under Notification No. 27/02-Cus dated 1st March 2002 are not entitled to any drawback under Section 74 of Customs Act 1962.
Held that the demand of services tax is not sustainable on the basis of TDS /26AS statements.
Held that it is well settled law that, the sale of software product which will not giving rise to royalty income.
Held that Commissioner should not simply relegate the point that the assessment order is erroneous to the AO. The Commissioner, after analyzing the record, ought to have recorded a categorical finding and provided valid reasons as to how the assessment order is erroneous. Revision unsustainable
Held that the conclusion that mere non-payment of duties is not equivalent to collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of fact is untenable as the Act contemplates a positive action which betrays a negative intent of wilful default.
