Held that disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) unsustainable as the amount of employees’ contribution to the provident fund deposited before filing of return.
Held that as the amount received by the assessee is not in the nature of royalty or FTS, section 44DA of the Income Tax Act will not apply.
Held that assessee incurs monthly recurring charges for telecommunication lines and since such expenditure doesnt bring any benefit of enduring nature the same are revenue in nature.
Held that estimating past savings as Rs. 6,00,000, without any basis, instead of Rs. 9,03,900 and also ignoring the evidences produced for the same. Addition of the same deleted.
Held that refractory bricks required for re-lining of the furnace are covered within the definition of capital goods and hence eligible for EPCG scheme as per notification no. 102/2009- Cus dated 11.09.2009
Held that allegation of clandestine removal only on the basis of incriminating statements, which were retracted, in absence of corroborative evidence is unsustainable.
Held that payment towards management support services is allowable as business expenditure as the same is paid for smooth and effective running of the business.
Chandigarh CESTAT held that if the department intends to classify the goods under a particular heading different from that claimed by the assessee, the department has to adduce proper evidence and discharge the burden of proof.
Held that addition made merely on the basis of statement by one of the partners and without finding any incriminating material is untenable in law.
Sanskruthi Motors Vs Joint Commissioner (Kerala High Court) Held that the officer was duty bound to consider the explanation offered by the petitioner for the expiry of the e-way bill. Hence, imposition of penalty/ tax on allegation that there was ample time to revalidate the e-way bill not justified as there was no finding of […]
