Kerala High Court held that where there is no liability to deduct TDS, the mere fact that TDS was so deducted and paid to the Income Tax Department belatedly, cannot give rise to a claim for interest under sub-section (1A) of Section 201 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment beyond four years period is invalid as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for the assessment.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that absolutely no indication as to how the amount received by the appellant from PGVCL would qualify as Business Auxiliary Service. Only bland allegation without any substantiation cannot be upheld.
ITAT Delhi held that that the salary paid by the head office to expatriate employees working in Indian branches is allowable as deduction under section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition of investment made in India by tax resident of UAE is unsustainable as in terms of Indo UAE tax treaty, the right to tax the income doesnt belong to India.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that investment made in gold ornaments was duly recorded in the books of accounts and also reflected in the block of assets. Hence, such investment cannot be stated to be remained unexplained.
ITAT Jaipur held that benefit of deduction under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act unavailable on bogus donation on adoption of unfair means.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of the assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act based on the approval granted in a routine and casual manner is unsustainable in the eye of law.
ITAT Chennai held that the VAT payment would not attract the provisions of section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act and hence, is allowable u/s.37 read with section 43B of the Act
ITAT Lucknow held that statement recorded u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act is not an incriminating material for the purpose of making search assessment u/s 153A.
