ITAT Pune held that claim for exemption of income under section 11 of the Income Tax Act deniable as Form No. 10B was not submitted along with the return of income nor it was submitted before processing of return of income.
ITAT Pune held that credit for TDS is available in the year in which income is reported, credit of TDS cannot be deferred on the basis of reporting by the deductor.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of Electricity Duty payable by the assessee by invoking provisions of section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is unwarranted and unjustified.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that compensation received from proposed building by way of allotment is extinguishment of right in relation to capital asset and hence provisions of section 45 of the Income Tax Act gets applicable.
ITAT Kolkata held that condonation of delay with explanation like non-availability of tax consultant or illness of Grandson without medical document is not reasonable cause of granting delay. Accordingly, appeals dismissed as time-barred.
ITAT Mumbai held that deposit of employee’s contribution to provident fund after the due date prescribed under the relevant statue is not allowable as deduction under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.
Madras High Court granted short accommodation to make further submissions in the case of revocation of cancellation of GST registration.
CESTAT Chennai held that benefit of CBEC Circular F. No. 137/167/2006-CX dated 3.10.2007 vis-à-vis provisions of section 73(1A) of the Finance Act, 1994, relating to conclusion of entire proceedings on payment of service tax along with interest not available, as assessee failed to pay reduced penalty as required.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that deposit in PLA is not a payment of duty. Accordingly, refund claim for unutilized balance in PLA is not hit by limitation of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Madras High Court held that as test report of petitioner and respondent differs, it is directed to carry out independent laboratory test to come to a conclusion that the whether the imported goods contained Polyrethrene or not to decide levy of Anti-dumping duty.
