Kerala High Court directed the First Appellate Authority to entertain the appeals preferred by the appellant against assessment order after collecting amounts due towards Kerala Legal Benefit Fund.
Bombay High Court held that there is no power available with the custom authorities to seal premises of any person, which are nothing but a form of immovable property.
Held that the non-inclusion of surrendered income in the Book Profits of the assessee as per section 115JB of the Act, was not a patent error amenable to rectification u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that provisions of section 292BB of the Income tax Act doesn’t cure complete absence of notice. Section seeks to cure only the manner of service of notice.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that rent received from sub-letting the property is taxable under the head ‘income from other sources’ and not under the head ‘income from house property’.
Maa Lilori Bhander Vs Commr. of Customs (Preventive) (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that appellant duly produced documentary evidences like GST invoice, E-way bill and consignment notes. Accordingly, once Appellant has provided documentary evidence, the burden of proving that the goods are of a foreign origin falls on the Department. Facts- In the present case […]
ITAT Delhi held that no part of the RPC fee is liable to be disallowed in terms of clause (i) of s. 40(a) because the second proviso clause (i) of Section 40(a) being curative and declaratory in nature has to be given retrospective effect.
ITAT Pune held that addition on account of cash deposits unsustainable as reasonable and plausible explanation given by the assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that addition of rental income as undisclosed merely because tenant as wrongly deducted TDS u/s. 194J is unsustainable as landlord cannot be blamed for wrong deduction of TDS.
CESTAT Chennai held that as transfer of technical knowhow not a condition for sale of capital goods, hence, technical knowhow fee not to be included in the assessable value of imported goods.
