Delhi High Court held that as per explanation inserted to Condition No. 104, exemption condition would be satisfied if the aircraft imported is used for non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services. Accordingly, use of imported aircraft by non-scheduled (passenger) services, shall not be construed to be a violation of conditions of imports at concessional rate of duty.
ITAT Chandigarh held that the income so surrendered by way of account receivables cannot be brought to tax under the deeming provisions u/s 69 r/w section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Kolkata held that imposition of penalties on both proprietorship firm and proprietor amounts to imposition of penalty twice and the same is unsustainable in the eyes of law.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that value of clearance of two entities having same partners are to be clubbed and excise duty on clearance exceeding the eligible limit of SSI exemption is duly payable.
ITAT Pune held that payment made voluntarily by the employer out of appreciation for the employee falls outside the rigours of Section 17(3)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that proportionate disallowance u/s 35AD of the Income Tax Act is justifiable as only one godown is used for non-agricultural purposes, whereas, other four go-downs are used for agricultural purposes only.
Delhi High Court held that impugned order directing GAIL to pay a sum of money which is not due and payable by GAIL is not sustainable.
Delhi High Court held that Notifications withdrawing the exemption from the ECOs and making the levy of GST, on the fare of non-air-conditioned stage carriage ticket booked through the electronic platform like UBER is constitutionally valid.
ITAT Kolkata held that the electricity load extension charges are allowable as revenue expenditure. Accordingly, addition towards the same is unjustifiable and liable to be set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that income can be said to have accrued only when there is certainty of receipts. Accordingly, impugned interest income cannot be said to be accrued as recovery of principal amount is also doubtful.
