ITAT Delhi held that the date of dispatch from the adjudicating officer is relevant for determining the limitation period. Accordingly, assessment order dispatched beyond time limit prescribed u/s. 153(1) is barred by limitation.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that actual oil quantity physically received into the shore tank should be taken as the basis for payment of duty at the time of ex-bond bills of entry.
ITAT Amritsar held that once source of surrendered income is proved to be business income, the same cannot be taxed as deemed income under section 69 read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that non-restoration of GST registration alleging non-filing of requisite form for change of place of business untenable as the same was not ground on which GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled in the first place.
CESTAT Chennai held that as there is no tax liability on the advance amount received by the appellant, demand of interest thereon unsustainable.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 towards unexplained income unsustainable as AO failed to consider leased land while assessing the agricultural income.
ITAT Mumbai held that damage on account of right to sue is a capital receipt and accordingly not chargeable to tax.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that the registration of the premises is not a pre-condition for availment of cenvat credit and thereof consequently the refund.
Allahabad High Court held that a departmental inquiry against government servant is not to be treated as a casual exercise and accordingly suspension of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax without merit is liable to be quashed.
Delhi High Court held that Amazon Web Services India Pvt. Ltd. (AWS India) is liable to withhold 8% (instead of 16%) tax of remittance on account of reseller fee paid to AWS USA.
