Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Books Submit Post Subscription
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax Section 5 Limitation Act Inapplicable to Section 107 GST Appeals: Uttarakhand HC Income Tax SC Refuses to Revive Section 148 Reassessment Notices Against GE Group Companies Income Tax SC Dismissed SLP Against Penalty Notice Ruling Under Section 271(1)(c)   Income Tax ITAT Dismisses Delayed Appeal & Upholds Income Estimation Under Section 44AD Income Tax Hyderabad ITAT Upholds Section 56(2)(x) Addition Based on Stamp Duty Value on Sale Deed Date Income Tax ITAT Sets Aside Reassessment for Failure to Record Material Disclosure Default Goods and Services Tax Karnataka HC Quashes Criminal Proceedings in KVAT Fraud Case Against Co-Accused Income Tax Technical Consultancy Services Taxable Under Section 44ADA, Not Section 44AD: Raipur ITAT
Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar

Contributing Author
Name: Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar Qualification: LLM BLS/LLB Education: LLM, LLB-BLS,DCLEAS Diploma in Cyber law, Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Articles Published: 8
Articles by this Author
Service TaxBombay HC Allows SVLDR Benefit Where Liability Was Quantified Earlier
Service Tax

Bombay HC Allows SVLDR Benefit Where Liability Was Quantified Earlier

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar3 months ago
Service TaxDirector’s Admission of Tax Liability Validates Quantification Under SVLDRS: Bombay HC
Service Tax

Director’s Admission of Tax Liability Validates Quantification Under SVLDRS: Bombay HC

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar2 years ago
Service TaxSVLDRS-3 Issued Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Bombay HC
Service Tax

SVLDRS-3 Issued Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Bombay HC

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar2 years ago
Service TaxBombay HC Remands Sabka Vishwas Case Over Non-Service of SVLDRS-3
Service Tax

Bombay HC Remands Sabka Vishwas Case Over Non-Service of SVLDRS-3

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar2 years ago
Service TaxBombay HC Strikes Down SVLDRS-3 due to technical glitch of Portal
Service Tax

Bombay HC Strikes Down SVLDRS-3 due to technical glitch of Portal

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar2 years ago
Custom DutyNo Section 112(b) Customs Penalty on co-noticee Without Positive Knowledge: CESTAT Mumbai
Custom Duty

No Section 112(b) Customs Penalty on co-noticee Without Positive Knowledge: CESTAT Mumbai

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar2 years ago
Custom DutyCESTAT Restores Appeal After Notice Sent to Wrong Address
Custom Duty

CESTAT Restores Appeal After Notice Sent to Wrong Address

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar2 years ago
Service TaxBombay HC Allows SVLDR Scheme Benefit Despite Excess Tax Declared
Service Tax

Bombay HC Allows SVLDR Scheme Benefit Despite Excess Tax Declared

Advocate Saurabh Mashelkar2 years ago