Central Government, having regard to the national interest, hereby notifies vide Notification No. 91/2018 the National Iranian Oil Company, as the foreign company and the arrangement for bilateral trade payments entered between the Government of India and the Government of Iran on 2nd November, 2018 as the arrangement subject to the condition that the said foreign company shall not engage in any activity in India, other than the receipt of income under the aforesaid arrangement.
Central Government hereby notifies for exemption U/s. 10(46) ‘Rajasthan State Open School Society’, Jaipur, a body constituted by the Government of Gujarat vide Notification No. 90/2018 Dated : 28th December, 2018. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) Notification No. 90/2018 New Delhi, the 28th December, 2018 S.O. 6355(E).—In exercise of […]
Securities and Exchange Board of India CIRCULAR SEBI/HO/IMD/DF2/CIR/P/2018/160 December 28, 2018 All Mutual Funds (MFs)/ Asset Management Companies (AMCs)/ Trustee Companies/ Boards of Trustees of Mutual Funds/ Sir / Madam, Subject: Creation of segregated portfolio in mutual fund schemes A. In order to ensure fair treatment to all investors in case of a credit event […]
Offer for Sale (OFS) of Shares through Stock Exchange Mechanism shall be available to companies with market capitalization of Rs.1000 crores and above, with the threshold of market capitalization computed as the average daily market capitalization for six months period prior to the month in which the OFS opens.
When cash payment was done on insistence of the seller, amount was duly recorded in the sale deed and no doubt was raised with regard to the genuineness of the transaction, disallowance u/s 40A(3) not justifiable.
Office Order No. 219 of 2018 The following Commissioners of Income Tax are hereby transferred and posted as per the table below, with immediate effect and until further orders:
It is also revealed that the reduction in discount doesn’t amount to profiteering as the same was offered from his profit margin by the Respondent and doesn’t not form part of the base price and therefore, the Respondent cannot be held guilty under Section 171 of the Act.
State Level Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering Vs Ahuja Radios (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The DGAP after scrutiny of the above two invoices issued by the Respondent has intimated that there was no increase in the per unit price (excluding GST) in respect of both the products mentioned in the above invoices. The base Price per unit […]
It is apparent from the perusal of the facts of the case that there was no reduction in the rate of tax on the above product w.e.f. 01-07-2017, as could be seen from the table given above. There is also no increase in the per unit base price (excluding tax) of the above product and therefore the allegation of profiteering is not established.
Kerala State Level Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering Vs Janson (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is apparent from the perusal of the facts of the case that there was no reduction in the rate of tax on the above product w.e.f. 01-07-2017, hence the anti-profiteering provisions contained in Section 171(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax […]
