Running your own business in this climate will surely set you up for success. However, this is only possible when you’re able to give your business the funds it needs over time, be it for working capital, to fill in the gap when you are awaiting a sizeable payment, or to pay for inventories in case an urgent order comes your way.
Have you ever heard of people that get rich by saving? No, because hoarding funds is not a great way to for anyone to maximise their profits. Rather, most people with a massive volume of funds get rich by making sound investments that yield substantial returns. Keeping this in mind, it must be said that […]
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be levied as assessee had proved that there was a reasonable cause for making the wrong claim under section 54 instead of section 54F.
ITAT held that roaming charges paid by the appellant to other telecom companies are not covered under ‘fee for technical service’ and such payments are out of the purview of TDS provision of 194J of the Act.
In absence of registered sale deed, the house boat purchased cannot be said as residential house and hence deduction u/s 54 cannot be allowed. Further The same cannot be equated with the residential house which is immovable property and hence deduction u/s 54 not allowed.
The court ordered the refund due for AY 1993-94 and 1995-96 to be granted to the assessee along with appropriate interest and also ordered a sum of INR 1.50 Lakhs to be paid to the assessee on account of inefficiency and lapse on the part of the department.
Income Tax Department hits at terror financing activities in J&K Region; Conducts sensitive search action at various place. The Head of a prominent Organisation allegedly indulging in anti-national activities along with his associates were covered in a sensitive search action by the Income Tax Department today. Ministry of Finance Income Tax Department hits at terror […]
Assessee submitted that they have not received any carbon credit during the year under consideration i.e. AY 2012-13. Assessee submitted that addition made by AO on account of non-existence income ought to be deleted.
The assessee has duly discharged its initial onus by submitting sufficient proof substantiating purchase and the payment is also routed through banking channel, simply because of non-existence of parties at the given address, the transaction cannot be treated as bogus and no addition can be made accordingly.
In view of section 92CA(4) as substituted by Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 1-6-2007, AO was bound by the order passed by TPO as he is required to compute total income in conformity with the ALP determined by TPO.
