Abani Kumar Dutta Vs. ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) Argument of Ld. Counsel for the assessee that the CIT in his revision order u/s 263 of the Act only directed the AO to examine the applicability of sec. 194G read with section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and not genuineness of the expenditure.
Krypton Industries Ltd. V/s. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)- Whether the action of AO for framing the assessment under section 147 is within his jurisdiction though the time for scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) has not lapsed.
Deepak Nagji Vira Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The monies are borrowed, incurring brokerage charges for the purpose, only for lending the same to a company at a predefined, agreed rate of interest, i.e., 12% p.a. That is, the assessee
ITAT Pune held In the case of Span Overseas Ltd. vs. CIT that from the show cause notice, it is clear that the CIT has invoked the provisions of section 263 on the proposal submitted by the DCIT and deficiencies in the assessment order pointed out by the DCIT.
Mangi Lal Sethia Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) In this present case, we find no live link between the reason to believe and reopening of case u/s 147 of the Act. It was a loan entry in the books of the assessee and the same was also settled within the same year.
Notification No. 94/2015 – Income Tax Whereas, an Agreement was entered into between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Republic of Macedonia for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income that was signed at Delhi on the 17th December, 2013 as set out in the Annexure to this notification (hereinafter referred to as the said Agreement):
Some Service Tax returns gets rejected after uploading of the XML file for the ST3 return, mainly due to the following reasons:- 1. Incorrect selection of return type – whether it is ?Original? or ?Revised? return. 2. When the Financial Year and the Period of Return are different in the XML file and in the […]
Forensic Audit can be termed as an examination and evaluation of a firm’s or individual’s financial information for use as evidence in court. A forensic audit can be conducted in order to prosecute a party for fraud, embezzlement or other financial claims. The objective of forensic audit is to relate the findings of audit by gathering legally […]
While reviewing the progress of EPFO on all fronts for the month of November, 2015, Shri K.K. Jalan, CPFC noted that by November end, the organization has settled more than 76 lakh claims in the current fiscal out of which more than 40% were settled within 3 days.
SEBI InvIT Regulations were notified on 26th September, 2014, thereby providing a regulatory framework for registration and regulation of InvITs in India. The Regulations, inter alia, provide that ‘The Board may specify by issue of guidelines or circulars any other requirements, as it deems fit, pertaining to issue and allotment of units by an InvIT, whether by way of public issue or private placement.
