CESTAT held that, there should be mens rea to evade payment of service tax for demand of service tax and penalty beyond period of limitation.
Discover the CESTAT, Chennai ruling on Service Tax liability for liquidated damages. Explore the case of M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited and understand why recovery of damages is not considered a taxable service. Stay informed on GST implications with insights from circular no. 178/10/2022-GST.
HC directs AO to provide effective cross-examination opportunity in accordance with provisions of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and permit petitioner to cross- examine without in any manner interfering or restricting.
Projects executed prior to June 01, 2007, which were in the nature of composite works contract, could not be brought within the fold of commercial or industrial construction service or CC services and for the period post June 01, 2007, the liability to pay Service Tax could be fastened under CC services only if the activities were in the nature of service simpliciter.
Explore the legal perspective on property transfer in a BOO contract. Learn how the Kerala High Court ruled on the taxation of fixed costs in the case of Prodair Air Products India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala, clarifying that payment of fixed costs does not necessarily imply a transfer of property.
HC held that, cancellation of registration effected on ground of non-filing of GST return, could be revoked and assessee can claim ITC
Assessee is eligible to avail ITC on purchase of a 7-seater vehicle, which will be subsequently converted into an ambulance for onward supply
SC set aside the order passed by the High Court imposing a condition of deposit while granting bail to the appellant therein.
SCN is deficient if it does not sufficiently disclose reasons why petitioner’s GST Registration was suspended or was proposed to be cancelled
HC held that penalty under Section 129(1)(b) of the UPGST Act was unjustified and untenable since the owner has come forward for payment of penalty.
