Jaffaorulla Syeaadunnishaa Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) Jaffaorulla Syeaadunnishaa (the Petitioner) challenged an assessment order dated December 24, 2019 (Assessment Order) under Section 144 of the Income tax act (IT Act) for being in violation of principles of natural justice and against the Circular dated December 26, 2019. The Petitioner was issued a show cause […]
Detention of the ‘Range Rover’ motor vehicle while being transported from Coimbatore to Thiruvananthapuram as ‘used personal effect’. The vehicle was detained on the allegation that it was transported without the E-way bill as contemplated under Rule 138 of the Kerala Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017
In Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata v. Batanagar Education and Research Trust [Civil Appeal No. 4451 of 2021], the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata (the Appellants) and the Tribunal had directed for cancellation of the registration of Batanagar Education and Research Trust (the Respondents) under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 […]
Aravali Shikshan Avum Anusandhan Sansthan Vs National E-Assessment Centre & Others (Rajasthan High Court) Aravali Shikshan Avum Anusandhan Sansthan (“the Petitioner”), has filed the current writ petition against the order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Center under Section 144-B along with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”) imposing Additional […]
HC set aside disqualification of the directors of the defaulting Company and provided an opportunity to the disqualified directors of the struck off Company under Companies Fresh Start Scheme, 2020 (Scheme) to be appointed as directors of other/new companies, provided the directors have gone a substantial period of their disqualification.
Three C Homes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court) Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent) filed an application for modification/ recall of the order dated July 16, 2021 (Impugned Order), passed in W.P. (C) No. 5912/2021 dated July 16, 2021, directing Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to enquiry on doubtful Income Tax Department’s action […]
The petitioner, being an assessee under Telangana GST Act, 2017, CGST Act, 2017, and IGST Act, 2017 is issued a letter specifying, Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by them are on the basis of fake invoices issued by certain fictitious suppliers/firms. The letter further specifies that, ITC availed by the petitioner is in a fraudulent manner without receiving any material, and the petitioner was requested to reverse ITC on such invoices.
ITAT- Held that, benefit of deduction under Section 54F of the IT Act cannot be denied to the Respondent merely on the ground that conveyance deed has not yet been got registered particularly when the Respondent is proved to be in possession of the property in question out of which the Respondent was already owner in possession of 1/3rd share since 2008 after making a complete payment of the sale consideration to the vendors and has duly proved possession over the property by way of electricity and water charges bills.
Unutilised ITC is an asset and a statutory right in the hands of the dealer that cannot be defeated by any procedural rules on account of technical glitches. Further held that, granting an opportunity of hearing is only to enable the process of decision-making simpler and it is one of the basic principles of natural justice and such technical issues do not stand in the way of rendering justice.
In M/s. MAN Energy Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. [GST-ARA, Application No. 56 dated October 17, 2019], M/s. MAN Energy Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (Applicant) has sought an advance ruling on, whether the supply of marine diesel engines (MDEs) and parts exclusively and directly to shipyards or Indian Navy by the Applicant for use in manufacture […]
