Bagadia Properties Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) It cannot be always presumed that the loans given to subsidiary companies are for business purposes. It is required to be proved that the subsidiary company has used the interest free loans for some business purposes. Facts- The assessee is undertaking the business of real estate development […]
Power Finance Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner (Appeal) (CESTAT Delhi) The fact that the corporate social responsibility is a legal responsibility does not make it an output service. The appellant not entitled to Cenvat Credit on the services used for corporate social responsibility. Facts- The appellant is a non-banking finance corporation engaged in financing projects and […]
JSW Steel Ltd. Vs Union of India (Orissa High Court) In view of definition of “Input Service Distributor” contained in Section 2(61), it is necessary that the ISD as an office is required to receive tax invoices towards inward supply. Facts- The Petitioner, being engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of hot and […]
Shaheed Bhagat Singh Educational Society Vs CIT(Exemption) (ITAT Amritsar) It is not obligatory for the assessee for maintain dissolution clause which will not be the issue for rejection of registration u/s 12A of the Act. Accordingly the registration U/s 12A could not be denied to the assessee-society for non maintain the dissolution clause. Facts- The […]
ACIT Vs Sanjay Agrawal (ITAT Raipur) Insignificant mistakes in the accounts cannot justify rejection of books of accounts of the assessee under Sec. 145(3) of the Act. Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment u/s. 143(2). Accordingly, A.O directed the assessee to substantiate its claim for deduction of expenses under the […]
Suvidha Fashions Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) The repairs of small modification carried out at the premises are small scale repair which cannot be classified with capital expenditure. Facts- The appellant is a partnership firm engaged in the business of embroidery job work. During assessment, AO noted that assessee has shown purchases of GPO cloth of […]
DCIT Vs Credit Suisse (Singapore) Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee conducts portfolio investments in Indian securities in its capacity as SEBI registered FII/FPI, conclusion of the learned CIT(A) that the offshore distribution commission income is in th nature of ‘business income’ of the assessee does not require any interference. Facts- The assessee is a company […]
Behag Overseas Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) Misdeclaration of goods and attempt to export such goods is punishable under Section 114 of the Customs Act. A Customs House Agent, who is a party to the mis-declaration, is liable to pay penalty. Facts- On specific intelligence, it was alleged that red sanders log are being […]
Dy.CIT Vs Sembcorp Energy India Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) Applicability of section 56(2)(viib) is only in a case where the shares are issued at a premium by a company in which public are not substantially interested. Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, it was craved before AO that price at which the shares were issued […]
Rattanindia Power Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Section 11B doesn’t apply to refunds pertains to an amount paid under mistake without any liability. Facts- That appellant is registered under service tax and are engaged in distribution of electricity during the period from July 2012 to June 2017. The appellant had paid service tax […]
