ITAT Kolkata held that as provisions of section 43CA of the Income Tax Act are introduced with effect from 1st April 2014, the said provisions are not applicable to ‘agreement to sell’ entered prior to 1st April 2014.
ITAT Delhi held that income classified as ‘business income’ but not considered for the purpose of working of deduction u/s 80HHC merely on the nomenclature that income are not derived from export is unjustifiable as it is not justified that income has no nexus with earning of export.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that resolution plan submitted by Resolution Professional (RP) of the corporate debtor- Safeco Hygiene Films Pvt. Ltd. duly complies with regulations of CIRP Regulations, 2016 as well as IB Code and, the resolution plan is found to be both feasible and viable as held by CoC. Accordingly, the same is approved.
ITAT Mumbai held that cancellation of registration of trust retrospectively from AY 2016-17 under section 12AB(4) of the Income Tax Act is invalid.
ITAT Mumbai held that Corporate Guarantee facility provided to overseas AE by the assessee is an international transaction and hence addition towards Arm’s Length Guarantee Fee confirmed.
Karnataka High Court held that payments made to Non-resident Telecom Operators for provision of bandwidth and Inter-connectivity Usage Charge are not covered as Royalty/ FTS and, accordingly, TDS not deductible. Further, assessee is entitled to take benefit of DTAA between two countries.
ITAT Jaipur held that the difference in the closing stock is emanating from the difference in the working for the preceding years and that such difference cannot be attributed for the year under consideration. Accordingly, order not erroneous and jurisdiction of section 263 not invocable.
Jammu Kashmir High Court held that the extended period of limitation as provided under provision to sub -section (1) of Section 11A was not invocable for the simple reason that the twin factors which are sine quo non for invoking the proviso were missing.
Explore ITAT Raipur’s verdict on tax collection by District Mining Officer (DMO). Understand the implications of not collecting tax at source (TCS) on compounding fees from illegal miners/transporters. Analysis of Section 206C(1C) and obligations under the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that transfer pricing adjustment should be restricted only in respect of turnover of assessee-company relating to international transactions. In nut-shell, transfer pricing addition should be restricted only qua international transaction and not entity level transactions.
