This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Hire Charges of vessel did not constitute ‘Royalty’ under India-Singapore DTAA as it was business income
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kreuz Challenger Pte Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Kreuz Challenger Pte Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Conclusion: Hire charges of a vessel did not constitute ‘Royalty’ as it was in the nature of business income and as there was no Permanent Establishment therefore, no taxability arose on account of business income. Merely because of the fact that assessee had applied for lower deduction certificate u/s 197, that in itself could not be a basis for imposing a tax liability as no admission against the interest of person was conclusive as far as it could be explained.
Held: AO observed that the hire charges earned by assessee fro...






