Case Law Details
Case Name : Bharti Airtel Limited Vs Commissioner (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bharti Airtel Limited Vs Commissioner (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court held that telecommunication towers would not fall within the ambit of Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. Thus, denial of input tax credit unsustainable in law.
Facts- These three writ petitions assail the proceedings drawn by the respondents under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and essentially question the characterization of telecommunication towers as immovable property and thus falling within the ambit of Section 17(5) of the CGST Act and being illegible for input tax credit.
Whi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
The judgement is also in sync with the SC’s decision in Safari Retreats wherein SC approved blocking of ITC u/s 17(5)(d) of CGST on immoveable property(IP) but kept open the case of those IP construction whereof was necessary for business of leasing or renting – Functionality Test. Thus, even if in worst case, Tower is deemed as IP, it may still qualify basis functionality test