Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Extension of time for payment is not modification of resolution plan: NCLAT

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 2490
Case Name
Cosmos Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Courts
Delhi NCLAT, NCLAT
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Cosmos Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi)

The case of Cosmos Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Ors. before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) revolves around the resolution process of S.K. Wheels Private Limited under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The core issue is whether the extension of time granted to the Resolution Applicant for payment constitutes a modification of the resolution plan, leading to liquidation.

The facts are as follows: The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against S.K. Wheels Private Limited, and a resolution plan submitted by Anil Kumar, the Promoter/Director, was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Subsequently, there were delays in payments by the Resolution Applicant, leading to concerns and requests for liquidation.

The Resolution Professional (RP) filed an application seeking liquidation due to the Resolution Applicant’s alleged failure to adhere to the payment timeline. However, the CoC, in a meeting, decided against liquidation, opting instead to grant further time for payment. This decision was supported by the majority vote, including that of Cosmos Cooperative Bank Ltd., a major Financial Creditor.

Respondent No.1, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., dissatisfied with the CoC’s decision, filed an application seeking liquidation, arguing that the decision not to liquidate constituted a modification of the approved resolution plan, which is impermissible under the IBC. The NCLT, in its impugned order, agreed with this argument and directed for liquidation.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 23,561

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.