The concept of “common areas” in residential complexes and real estate developments is pivotal for understanding the shared responsibilities and rights of property owners, developers, and residents. The definitions of these areas as stipulated in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and the Apartment Ownership Act (AOA) form the backbone of community living and property management. This analysis seeks to dissect these definitions, explore their similarities and differences, and provide a comprehensive understanding of their implications.
The Definitions
RERA (Section 2(n)) defines “common areas” as:
- The entire land for the real estate project, or for a specific phase if the project is developed in phases.
- Staircases, lifts, lobbies, fire escapes, and common entrances and exits of buildings.
- Common basements, terraces, parks, play areas, open parking areas, and storage spaces.
- Lodging for persons employed for property management, including security and community service personnel.
- Central services installations such as electricity, water, sanitation, air-conditioning, and systems for water conservation and renewable energy.
- Water tanks, sumps, motors, fans, compressors, ducts, and all apparatus connected with installations for common use.
- All community and commercial facilities provided within the project.
- Other parts necessary for maintenance, safety, and common use.
The Apartment Ownership Act (Section 3(f)) outlines “common areas and facilities” as:
- The land on which the building is located and structural components like foundations, walls, and roofs.
- Halls, corridors, lobbies, stairs, stairways, fire escapes, and entrances and exits.
- Basements, cellars, yards, gardens, parking areas, and storage spaces.
- Premises for lodging janitors or property management personnel.
- Installations for central services such as power, light, gas, hot and cold water, heating, refrigeration, and air conditioning.
- Elevators, tanks, pumps, motors, fans, compressors, ducts, and generally all apparatus and installations for common use.
- Community and commercial facilities as specified in the Declaration.
- All other parts necessary for the property’s existence, maintenance, safety, or normally in common use.
The definitions of “common areas” in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and the Apartment Ownership Act are similar in their scope but differ in some specifics. Here’s a brief comparison highlighting the similarities and differences, and noting which definition covers specific aspects:
Similarities
Both definitions include:
- Land and Structural Components: Both laws define common areas as including the land on which the building is constructed, along with fundamental structural elements such as foundations, main walls, and roofs.
- Access Facilities: Stairways, lobbies, fire escapes, and entrances and exits are included under both laws.
- Service Installations: Central services like electricity, water, and sanitation systems are recognized by both.
- Recreational and Utility Spaces: Areas such as gardens, parking areas, and storage spaces are common in both definitions.
Differences
- Specificity in Descriptions: RERA is more specific in defining phases of development and the scope of common areas related to each phase. It explicitly mentions the accommodations for personnel like security and maintenance staff, which is less specific in the Apartment Ownership Act.
- Commercial Facilities: RERA explicitly mentions community and commercial facilities provided in the real estate project, while the Apartment Ownership Act implies these under the broad category of “all other parts of the property necessary or convenient to its existence, maintenance, and safety.”
- Technical and Mechanical Installations: RERA explicitly lists installations like air conditioning, incinerating systems, and renewable energy systems. The Apartment Ownership Act, while including similar facilities, tends to generalize them under installations for common use without specifying types.
- Legislative Scope: RERA focuses more on the development and management phases of real estate projects, aiming at both transparency and regulation, whereas the Apartment Ownership Act is more focused on the ownership and management of apartment buildings.
Coverage Analysis
- Staff Accommodation: RERA clearly covers accommodations for all management and security personnel, a point less explicitly covered under the Apartment Ownership Act.
- Phased Developments: RERA’s mention of phased developments provides clarity on how common areas are defined and managed in large projects developed in stages, which is not specifically covered by the Apartment Ownership Act.
- Renewable Energy and Conservation Systems: Specifically mentioned under RERA, these are not explicitly covered under the Apartment Ownership Act, reflecting RERA’s more modern approach to sustainable development.
Implications for Property Owners and Developers
The designation of common areas affects several aspects of property ownership and management, including:
- Maintenance Responsibilities: Identifying which areas are considered common ensures clarity in maintenance obligations, typically managed by homeowners’ associations or property managers.
- Cost Sharing: Costs associated with the upkeep of common areas are generally shared among all property owners, making it crucial to understand these areas’ extents.
- Legal Compliance: Developers must adhere to these definitions to ensure compliance with relevant laws, avoiding potential disputes or legal challenges.
Conclusion
Understanding the definition of “common areas” as delineated in RERA is not merely about appreciating shared spaces within a real estate development; it carries significant legal implications that affect the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved, especially in light of Section 14(3) of the Act. This section underscores the promoter’s obligation to address any structural defects or shortcomings in workmanship, quality, or provision of services within five years of handing over possession to the allottee. It mandates that such issues, once reported by the allottee, must be rectified by the promoter at no additional charge within thirty days.
The clear understanding of what constitutes “common areas” becomes crucial here because these areas often include elements critical to the structural integrity and essential services of the development—such as foundations, electrical systems, water management installations, and common structural components. Knowing whether a particular defect falls within the ambit of “common areas” can determine the promoter’s responsibility to rectify it under the stipulated timeframe.
Moreover, in cases where the promoter fails to address these defects within the designated period, the allottee is entitled to compensation. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of “common areas” as defined by RERA not only helps in ensuring the proper maintenance and management of these spaces but also empowers allottees by clarifying their legal recourse in instances of non-compliance by the promoter.
In conclusion, the provisions of Section 14(3) make it imperative for all stakeholders, especially promoters and allottees, to have a thorough knowledge of the scope of “common areas.” This knowledge not only aids in the proper upkeep and enhancement of property value but also safeguards the interests of residents against potential oversights or lapses by developers, thereby fostering a more compliant and harmonious living environment.
Author Bio
You can reach me at rera@mjmassociate.com