H.P. VAT: HC can exercise revisional jurisdiction against orders passed by Tax Tribunal either under Section 45(2) or 46(3)

State of Himachal Pradesh and others Vs Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd. (Himachal Pradesh High Court)

The State of Himachal Pradesh and Others vs. Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd. is a landmark case decided by the Himachal Pradesh High Court. It delves into the complexities surrounding the Value Added Tax (VAT) laws, specifically the Himachal Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (HP VAT Act). The case examines whether the High Court can exercise its revisional jurisdiction under Section 48(1) of the HP VAT Act against orders passed by the Tax Tribunal either under Section 45(2) or 46(3). This article provides an in-depth analysis of the case and its implications for taxation jurisprudence in Himachal Pradesh.

The Dispute

Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd., engaged in the sale of mobile phones and other electronic goods, was issued a demand for Rs. 52.15 lacs by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (DETC). This demand was based on a differential amount of tax concerning the VAT rate on mobile phone chargers. Nokia challenged the imposition, claiming that the charger was a part of the mobile phone and should be taxed at the same VAT rate of 5%.

Court Proceedings

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.