This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Differential classification of same goods imported at different places would negate very purpose of Tariff Act
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of Customs Vs Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Commissioner of Customs Vs Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd (CESTAT Mumbai)
Differential classification of same goods imported at different places would negate very purpose of Tariff Act
CESTAT held that differential classification of the impugned goods imported at different places would negate the very purpose of the Tariff Act on the one hand and would cause avoidable litigation for the importers on the other.
FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT MUMBAI ORDER
A bunch of appeals (No. C/88479, 88483, 88485, 88487, 88492/2018, C/87032, 87033, 87034, 87035, 87036, 87037, 87038, 87039/2019) filed by the Revenue aga...
