Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dilip B. Mundada Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dilip B. Mundada Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) Jurisdictional High Court and other Hon’ble High Courts and ITAT Pune have held that for availing the benefit of deduction u/s 54F the new asset shall be purchased in the name of the assessee. Applying the said proposition of law to the present case, we hold that the Flat No. 401 is not in the name of the assessee, hence it is not eligible for exemption u/s 54F of the Act. The assessee claimed that the amount for Flat No. 401 was invested by him. However, it is factually incorrect. It is observed from the documents filed in the paper book that the payment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930