Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Applications for stay should not be disposed of in a routine manner unmindful of the consequences

Case Law Details

Case Name
Lanco Infra Tech Ltd. Versus CESTAT (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
The appellant/ assessee availed the benefit under the Works Contracts Composition Scheme in respect of contracts entered into prior to 1-6-2007.  The respondent/department issued show cause notice proposing service tax, interest and penalty on the ground that the petitioner was not eligible to avail the benefit under the Composition Scheme. Being aggrieved, the petitioner went in appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act). The petitioner also moved an interlocutory application seeking waiver of pre- deposit and stay of recovery of service tax and penalty. By the impugn...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *