Introduction
The definition of income under the income tax act, 1961 is intentionally wide and all-encompassing. Contrary to normal business knowledge, income according to the tax law can also comprise some amount that is not received or earned in the traditional sense. Using legal fiction, Parliament has made tax authorities treat financial transactions that cannot be explained as income. These provisions are popularly known as deemed income provisions, which were mainly represented in Section 68 to 69D of the Act.
The doctrine of deemed income is an act of legislation to curb the tax evasion, unaccounted wealth and circulation of black money. This blog embarks on a doctrinal and statutory review of these clauses, the extent of the same, burden of proof, principles of interpretation, and taxation implications in accordance with Section 115BBE.
Ideational and Legal Structure.
Charging Provisions
Taxation has its basis in:
Section 4 – Charge of Income Tax
Section 5 – Scope of Total Income.
Definition of Income under Section 2(24).
Section 2(24) is inclusive of definition, which means that the legislators intended to broaden the definition of the income beyond its traditional boundaries.
Income provisions that are considered to be enlarged are in operation under this widened framework. They are not pegged on real accrual or receipt but the failure of the assessee to satisfactorily justify some of the financial entries or assets.
III. Delegation of Provisions on Deemed Income (Sections 68-69D)
Such parts result in statutory presumptions and burden the evidentiary on the assessee.
Unexplained credit of cash – The credit of cash should not be explained without providing reasons to show how the cash was obtained (FMA, 2004).
Statutory Position:
In case any sum is discovered credited in the books of the assessee in a prior year and:
The assessee has no reply to say concerning the nature and source; or
This is not an acceptable explanation in the mind of the Assessing Officer,
The amount can be subjected to income tax as income of that preceding year.
Essential Requirements:
The assessee must prove:
- Identity of creditor
- Creditworthiness
- Genuineness of transaction
Doctrinal Importance:
Section 68 is also often used in situations where:
- Share capital
- Unsecured loans
- Accommodation entries
The onus of proving is at first on the assessee. In case released on documentary evidence, the weight is laid on the Revenue.
Section 69. – Unexplained Investments.
Where investments made by the assessee are not reflected in books and the assessee is incapable of satisfactorily explaining how they came about, the value of such investment is considered income.
Key Elements:
- Investment must exist
- Not recorded in books
- Unsatisfactory explanation
The provision is widely used in the real estate and benami transactions.
Section 69A – Unexplained Money, Bullion, Jewellery, etc.
In case the assessee is identified to be the owner of:
- Money
- Bullion
- Jewellery
- Valuable articles
The value will be considered as income, and it will not be recorded in books, and no satisfactory explanation shall be provided.
The section is extensively applied in search and seizure operations when it comes to income taxes raids.
Section 69B – Value of Investment Unfairly Disclosed.
Where:
Investment or asset is mentioned in books, but
Assessing Officer determines that the actual investment is greater than recorded amount,
The surplus can be considered as deemed income.
This deals with underestimation and under-representation of real consideration.
The section 69C -Unexplained Expenditure.
Where the assessee spends money, and fails to satisfactorily account how the money came into his hands:
- They consider this spending as income.
- There should be no deduction regarding such deemed income.
This avoids cases where taxpayers argue about the expenses financed by unreported income.
Hundi Transactions – Section 69D.
When borrowed or paid back by hundi (traditional negotiable instrument) other than by account payee cheque, the same is treated as deemed income.
The reason behind this provision was to restrain informal and undocumented credit systems.
Nature of Legal Fiction
The statutory legal fiction of deemed income is such examples.
A legal fiction:
- Consider something true when it is not true in fact.
- Should be taken literally.
- Can not be carried out of its intention.
Section 68-69D incomes are not real income but those that are assumed by statute.
The Supreme Court has always considered that taxes laws should be taken strictly but anti-evasion clauses should be construed purposively to avoid abuse.
Burden of Proof and Evidentiary Principles.
These provisions have a great impact on evidentiary burden.
Initial Burden:
- On the assessee to provide:
- Documentary proof
- Bank statements
- Confirmations
- Income details of creditors
- Satisfactory Explanation: The term not satisfactory in the opinion of the Assessing Officer does not give him arbitrary power. The opinion must be Reasonable, Based on material evidence and Not mechanical.
Therefore, judicial control provides a balance between the revenue interest and rights of the taxpayers.
Taxation under Section 115BBE
To discourage abuse, Section 115BBE was established financially on stringent taxation.
Present Framework:
Section 68-69D Income is taxed at:
- 60% base tax
- Applicable surcharge
- Health & Education cess
Additional Restrictions:
- No deduction allowed
- None of the set-off of losses allowed.
This is an expression of a punitive fiscal policy on unexplainable income.
The amendment became important after the devaluation of the money, which enhanced the anti-black money regime.
Critical Evaluation
Justifications:
- Protects tax base
- Deters explains unaccounted transactions.
- Enhances financial accountability.
- Concerns:
- Large discretion to Assessing Officers.
- Harsh tax rate
- Genuine transactions have documentation issues.
- Nevertheless, there are protective measures in the form of:
- Appellate remedies
- Judicial review
- Natural justice principles.
Contemporary Relevance
The provisions on deemed income are most often resorted to in:
- Income tax raids
- Corporate assessments
- Share capital investigations.
- Real estate scrutiny
- Shell company cases
In the practice of tax litigation (in particular with metropolitan jurisdiction such as with Delhi), the Section 68-69D makes a significant part of the contentious additions presented to appellate courts.
Conclusion
The doctrine of deemed income according to the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a complex legislative device, which is aimed at combating the tax evasion. Section 68 to 69D allow the Parliament to make presumptions under the law such that taxable income becomes broader than is commonly understood.
Although these provisions are strict, they have a paramount fiscal purpose of accountability and a hindrance of abuse of the financial systems. The checks and balances of judiciary make sure that such powers are not arbitrated.
Doctrinally, deemed income provisions depict the application of legal fiction in the taxation law to safeguard the public revenue without compromising procedural fairness.
Author Bio
