Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Vague Penalty Notice Invalidates Search Penalty Under Section 271AAB: ITAT Ranchi

Case Law Details

Case Name
Suresh Kumar Modi HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement Suresh Kumar Modi HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi) The ITAT, Ranchi Bench, held that penalty u/s 271AAB cannot survive where the notice u/s 274 is vague and does not specify the exact charge or clause invoked. In this case (AY 2016-17), though the assessee had admitted undisclosed income during search and paid tax, the AO issued a routine penalty notice without mentioning which specific limb of s.271AAB was applicable. The Tribunal noted that the notice merely contained standard language (“concealed particulars / furnished inaccurate particulars”) and failed to disclose the statut...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA RAJESH KUMAR
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangaluru, Karnataka
Articles Published: 41

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *