This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Vague Penalty Notice Invalidates Search Penalty Under Section 271AAB: ITAT Ranchi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Suresh Kumar Modi HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ranchi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Suresh Kumar Modi HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Ranchi)
The ITAT, Ranchi Bench, held that penalty u/s 271AAB cannot survive where the notice u/s 274 is vague and does not specify the exact charge or clause invoked. In this case (AY 2016-17), though the assessee had admitted undisclosed income during search and paid tax, the AO issued a routine penalty notice without mentioning which specific limb of s.271AAB was applicable.
The Tribunal noted that the notice merely contained standard language (“concealed particulars / furnished inaccurate particulars”) and failed to disclose the statut...





