Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Audit Penalty Set Aside Due to Bona Fide Cause for Delay

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sreedevi Voram Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-2019
Advertisement
Sreedevi Voram Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Penalties for Non-Compliance & Audit Delay Deleted: ITAT Hyderabad Grants Full Relief The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT allowed both appeals of the assessee for AY 2018-19, deleting penalties levied under sections 272A(1)(d) and 271B, holding that there was no deliberate or contumacious default and that the assessee had shown reasonable cause within the meaning of section 273B. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) (Non-compliance of notices): Although the AO levied penalty alleging non-response to notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1), the Tribunal noted that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,493

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *