Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sreedevi Voram Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sreedevi Voram Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Penalties for Non-Compliance & Audit Delay Deleted: ITAT Hyderabad Grants Full Relief The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT allowed both appeals of the assessee for AY 2018-19, deleting penalties levied under sections 272A(1)(d) and 271B, holding that there was no deliberate or contumacious default and that the assessee had shown reasonable cause within the meaning of section 273B. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) (Non-compliance of notices): Although the AO levied penalty alleging non-response to notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1), the Tribunal noted that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930