Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sreedevi Voram Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sreedevi Voram Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Penalties for Non-Compliance & Audit Delay Deleted: ITAT Hyderabad Grants Full Relief The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT allowed both appeals of the assessee for AY 2018-19, deleting penalties levied under sections 272A(1)(d) and 271B, holding that there was no deliberate or contumacious default and that the assessee had shown reasonable cause within the meaning of section 273B. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) (Non-compliance of notices): Although the AO levied penalty alleging non-response to notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1), the Tribunal noted that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930